Tag Archives: uk

Going Batty: Animal Architecture


It could be said that architecture is one of the most humanist pursuits, existing solely to make humans happy.

The always clever BLDGBLOG this week features the Bat Spiral, a project by UK architecture firm Friend and Company which shows that animals can get just as much enjoyment from architecture.

Based just outside of London, the Bat Spiral is designed to provide a roost (cave?) for the 17 bat species that are native to the UK.  The 45 square metre structure can house about 330 bats who are attracted to the structure for its dark spaces, and for the warmth generated from the black timber walls.

It is also surprisingly beautiful with its simple, reed-like support columns raising it above the swamp, and its graceful painted timber curves.


Leave a comment

Posted by on August 6, 2009 in architecture, building


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Paul Graham: A1, The Great North Road


While browsing Paul Graham’s Archives which he so generously makes available to all and sundry, I came across his series A1: The Great North Road, from 1981-2.

The A1 is the longest road in Britain, running from St Paul’s Cathedral, London, to the centre of Edinburgh, via Leeds and Newcastle.  A journey on the A1, therefore, captures a complete cross-section of British life in a way that no other road can.

Throughout his journey, Graham captures this cross-section so brilliantly, combining as he always does social commentary and photojournalism with artistically stunning images.  A woman captured walking in the heart of London is surrounded by bankers, in stark contrast to another woman waiting at a bus stop in London’s impoverished northern suburbs, literally ‘up the road’.

It would be an interesting exercise to make the journey in current times and see what changes have been wrought.  One would imagine there would be new freeways, big box retail and neon-lit ‘service centres’, yet still the same air of suburban angst and hopelessness faintly lingering.






Leave a comment

Posted by on May 31, 2009 in looking, photography


Tags: , , , , , ,

Manchester Justice Centre

Manchester Exterior2

It must be difficult, as an architect, designing a ‘justice centre’.  At the back of your mind would be the fact that murderers, rapists, drug lords and – at least in Manchester, countless Vicki Pollard wannabes – are going to grace the corridors of your building, yelling and screaming and crying and cursing.  It would be tempting to do what so many architects have done throughout the ages, and design a building that is intended to terrify its occupants into compliance.

DentonCorkerMarshall have taken a novel approach and come up with a design that is open and contemporary, yet still assertive.  It is designed to the highest environmental standards, a claim confirmed by winning the Royal Institute of British Architects’ English Partnerships Sustainability Award late last year. The building has shades of Paul Katsieris’s Melbourne Federal Court building (check out the online tour here).

So even though sustainable, contemporary design is unlikely to keep Ms Pollard off the streets, at the very least Manchester has an bold, innovative addition to its skyline.

Manchester Exterior

Manchester Lightwell

Leave a comment

Posted by on May 6, 2009 in architecture, building


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

‘‘What we can rely on is our creativity, our inspiration and our passion’’

I had to reproduce this excellent article by Kevin Spacey in New Statesman.  Are you listening, K.Rudd?

Amid the never-ending talk of credit crunch, downturn and recession, it is inevitable, say the doomsters and gloomsters, that there will be less money for the arts and culture. So the question then becomes: does it matter? Surely these are luxury items that we can do without when times are tough? As strongly as I can, I would argue no.

I believe in arts and culture and I believe that, far from being luxury items, they are a necessity in our lives, as individuals and as nations. Countries may go to war but it is culture that unites us: the words of a great writer, the style of a legendary dancer, the brilliance our favourite actors display in bringing life to their roles, a Mozart piano concerto, the endless mystery of Mona Lisa’s smile, the flickering images on celluloid and the countless stories they have told. Here in Shakespeare’s country, this should be understood more clearly perhaps than anywhere else in the world – that the arts inspire, uplift, challenge, stimulate our conversations, drive our debates and remain in our memories.

What I have come to recognise, in my six years of fundraising for the Old Vic theatre in London, is that those of us who make an argument for supporting the arts have not used the economic impact of arts and culture as the centrepiece of our appeals as much as we should. Too often we focus solely on the social aspects of what we can achieve, or the artistic merits. These are important and valid, but I believe we should change tack at this time. Instead of apologetically holding our hat in our hands, we should cite the economic successes of what is called show business. We can do better by recognising how much our cultural life contributes to the health of communities across our nation and, indeed, around the world. Those who enjoy culture should be more aware of the financial contribution arts institutions make to their communities.

Relationships between business and the arts offer a real chance to achieve financial success – not only for each other, but also to generate income for the hotels, restaurants and countless other businesses that populate the neighbourhoods where cultural centres operate. I for one do not want to see another regeneration plan that does not have arts and culture at the heart of its offer. Without it, we are not building rounded communities, but ignoring the fabric and soul of society.

It is also important that the arts remain high on the agenda of government. I was hugely encouraged to see that President Obama’s stimulus package included an additional $50m towards investment in the arts, despite efforts by some to remove that amount before the Senate was to vote on it. Even at a time when economic issues dominate, the president of the United States only needed to look at the successes we have achieved to conclude that culture should not suffer. But it is not going to be easy to maintain or increase the amount that government contributes. We are going to have to fight for it. We must learn to make the economic arguments that will sway even the most hardened opponents of support for the arts.
In addition, education through the arts enriches the next generation, not just of artists, but of our whole workforce. Theatre, for example, teaches young people to share, to commu­nicate, to resolve conflicts and to explore ideas. All of this is good for business because it contributes to interpersonal skills, which then translate into customer care. So it’s not charity or empty philanthropy, it is an investment in the future of our society.

If we lose more of the places where emerging talent can develop, where does a young person go to learn their craft? How does someone ever get to work on a West End stage if there is no longer a place to challenge and develop talent when young? If more theatres close in our provincial towns, if more of our cultural centres face a threatened economic future, if more of the smaller venues lose their funding – then the more our society will suffer. And if we don’t do what we can to stem this tide, we risk allowing our rich cultural life to lose its rightful place – or, even worse, fade from view, becoming reserved only for those who can afford to pay the big prices, in the big cities, for what has been too often in the past an exclusive club.

In these turbulent times, our concepts of what we value are being reconsidered. Banks may collapse, individuals might display unprecedented levels of greed and innocent people may become casualties. But what we can rely on is our creativity, our inspiration and our passion.

The creative industries lead the UK economy. They constitute one of the nation’s most powerful natural resources. We must do everything we can to ensure that our cultural heritage is protected – for we abandon the arts at our peril. Our arts and culture are the envy of the world and the jewel in Britain’s crown. Let’s shout louder to make sure those in positions of power and influence realise their value to our economy, as well as to our collective soul. The question is not “What can the economy do for our arts?” but “What can the arts do for our economy?” The answer: a good deal.

Leave a comment

Posted by on April 13, 2009 in politicking, thinking


Tags: , , , , , , ,